🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to enact a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.